Differentiate Between Fardhu and Wajeeb
 |
| fardhu |
Hanafis and Ahmad
went in a novel to differentiate between Fardhu and Wajeeb.
And proceeded
to what has been proved by evidence of a definite knowledge of the book or the
year of frequent or consensus,
And the orbit of
duty they have a language on the fall and required, and proceeded to what is
evidence is positive for science, and prove the duty they have evidence of my
mind.
The effect of the
distinction between Fardhu and Wajeeb.on the Hanafi is shown in the fact that
the imposition of the act is kaafir, because he denied what he had to do, and
he does not expiate the obligatory duty, because his evidence does not
necessitate belief,
The first example of
the five prayers, they impose scientific and practical,
An example of the
second Witr prayer at Abu Hanifa is the imposition of my work, and it is said
to him: the imposition of work, a duty to believe
موسوعة الفقهية الكويتية
وَذَهَبَ الْحَنَفِيَّةُ وَأَحْمَدُ فِي رِوَايَةٍ إِلَى التَّفْرِيقِ بَيْنَ الْفَرْضِ وَالْوَاجِبِ ، فَمَدَارُ الْفَرْضِ عِنْدَهُمْ لُغَةً عَلَى الْقَطْعِ ، وَشَرْعًا عَلَى مَا ثَبَتَ بِدَلِيلٍ مُوجِبٍ لِلْعِلْمِ قَطْعًا مِنَ الْكِتَابِ أَوِ السُّنَّةِ الْمُتَوَاتِرَةِ أَوِ الإِجْمَاعِ ، وَمَدَارُ الْوَاجِبِ عِنْدَهُمْ لُغَةً عَلَى السُّقُوطِ وَاللُّزُومِ ، وَشَرْعًا عَلَى مَا يَكُونُ دَلِيلُهُ مُوجِبًا لِلْعِلْمِ ، فَيَثْبُتُ الْوَاجِبُ عِنْدَهُمْ بِدَلِيلٍ ظَنِّيٍّ .
وَيَظْهَرُ أَثَرُ التَّفْرِيقِ بَيْنَ الْفَرْضِ وَالْوَاجِبِ عِنْدَ الْحَنَفِيَّةِ فِي أَنَّ جَاحِدَ الْفَرْضِ كَافِرٌ ؛ لأَنَّهُ أَنْكَرَ مَا وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ اعْتِقَادُ فَرْضِيَّتِهِ قَطْعًا ، وَلا يَكْفُرُ جَاحِدُ الْوَاجِبِ ، لأَنَّ دَلِيلَهُ لا يُوجِبُ الاعْتِقَادَ ، وَإِنَّمَا يُوجِبُ الْعَمَلَ ، وَلِذَا يُفَسَّقُ تَارِكُهُ ، وَمِثَالُ الأَوَّلِ الصَّلَوَاتُ الْخَمْسُ ، فَإِنَّهَا فَرْضٌ عِلْمِيٌّ وَعَمَلِيٌّ ، وَمِثَالُ الثَّانِي صَلاةُ الْوِتْرِ عِنْدَ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ فَهِيَ فَرْضٌ عَمَلِيٌّ ، وَيُقَالُ لَهُ : فَرْضٌ عَمَلا ، وَاجِبٌ اعْتِقَادًا
